备注
Go to the end 下载完整的示例代码。或者通过浏览器中的MysterLite或Binder运行此示例
梯度提升正规化#
不同规则化策略对梯度增强的影响说明。该例子取自Hastie et al 2009 [1].
使用的损失函数是二项偏差。通过收缩进行正规化 (learning_rate < 1.0
)显着提高了性能。结合收缩、随机梯度增强 (subsample < 1.0
)可以通过bagging减少方差来生成更精确的模型。没有收缩的子采样通常效果很差。另一种减少方差的策略是对要素进行二次采样,类似于随机森林中的随机分割(通过 max_features
参数)。

# Authors: The scikit-learn developers
# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from sklearn import datasets, ensemble
from sklearn.metrics import log_loss
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
X, y = datasets.make_hastie_10_2(n_samples=4000, random_state=1)
# map labels from {-1, 1} to {0, 1}
labels, y = np.unique(y, return_inverse=True)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.8, random_state=0)
original_params = {
"n_estimators": 400,
"max_leaf_nodes": 4,
"max_depth": None,
"random_state": 2,
"min_samples_split": 5,
}
plt.figure()
for label, color, setting in [
("No shrinkage", "orange", {"learning_rate": 1.0, "subsample": 1.0}),
("learning_rate=0.2", "turquoise", {"learning_rate": 0.2, "subsample": 1.0}),
("subsample=0.5", "blue", {"learning_rate": 1.0, "subsample": 0.5}),
(
"learning_rate=0.2, subsample=0.5",
"gray",
{"learning_rate": 0.2, "subsample": 0.5},
),
(
"learning_rate=0.2, max_features=2",
"magenta",
{"learning_rate": 0.2, "max_features": 2},
),
]:
params = dict(original_params)
params.update(setting)
clf = ensemble.GradientBoostingClassifier(**params)
clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
# compute test set deviance
test_deviance = np.zeros((params["n_estimators"],), dtype=np.float64)
for i, y_proba in enumerate(clf.staged_predict_proba(X_test)):
test_deviance[i] = 2 * log_loss(y_test, y_proba[:, 1])
plt.plot(
(np.arange(test_deviance.shape[0]) + 1)[::5],
test_deviance[::5],
"-",
color=color,
label=label,
)
plt.legend(loc="upper right")
plt.xlabel("Boosting Iterations")
plt.ylabel("Test Set Deviance")
plt.show()
Total running time of the script: (0分6.676秒)
相关实例

收缩协方差估计:LedoitWolf vs OAS和最大似然
Shrinkage covariance estimation: LedoitWolf vs OAS and max-likelihood
Gallery generated by Sphinx-Gallery <https://sphinx-gallery.github.io>
_